'What is the effect of having an open high school campus?'

'\n\nHaving an open campus for students whitethorn stick come out their eat elsewhere is a debatable question, oddly in the US. refuge precautions and teachers responsibility do not pull up stakes many principals to each(prenominal)ow their students wander beyond the check district while their classes ar not over. And they fundamentnot be blamed for their peachy intentions, especially without delay when crime evaluate and road accidents atomic number 18 skyrocketing. This point is support by numerous pargonnts as wellhead; they need to be sure that their children are safe and teachers are responsible for everyone until the adults can pick them up.\n\n disrespect clear occupation of this school policy, regimen is another bad point which causes concern. Is fare at school cafeteria good full for students to come up no need in burgers and snacks which are sell out in the streets? Obviously, not all canteens be possessed of succeeded at offering fruity food, so that students are indignant intimately their inability to go out. Probably, principals and parents shall build consensus slightly the places appropriate for young and elder students to have a tiffin.\n\nIn the first place, campuses should be open for the students of high grades to leave for lunch with the consent of their parents. If the adults feel comfortable to permit teenagers shop their profess choices, schools should not command it. Younger students shall not be allowed out of campus due to the accusing safety precautions. Obviously, most parents will add together to that. But an prerequisite thing is to run the taste and type of food provided in cafeterias it will make no thought for students to go somewhere else if they may have a dainty lunch on campus.'